Robert P. Crease, Peter D Bond(With)
Robert P. Crease, Peter D Bond(With)
Rate this book
How the discovery of a harmless leak of radiation sparked a media firestorm, political grandstanding, and fearmongering that closed a vital scientific facility. In 1997, scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory found a small leak of radioactive water near their research reactor. Brookhaven was—and is—a world-class, Nobel Prize–winning lab, and its reactor was the cornerstone of US materials science and one of the world’s finest research facilities. The leak, harmless to health, came from a storage pool rather than the reactor. But its discovery triggered a media and political firestorm that resulted in the reactor’s shutdown, and even attempts to close the entire laboratory. A quarter century later, the episode reveals the dynamics of today’s controversies in which fears and the dismissal of science disrupt serious discussion and research of vital issues such as vaccines, climate change, and toxic chemicals. This story has all the elements of a thriller, with vivid characters and dramatic twists and turns. Key players include congressmen and scientists; journalists and university presidents; actors, supermodels, and anti-nuclear activists, all interacting and teaming up in surprising ways. The authors, each with insider knowledge of and access to confidential documents and the key players, reveal how a fact of no health significance could be portrayed as a Chernobyl-like disaster. This compelling exposé reveals the gaps between scientists, politicians, media, and the public that have only gotten more dangerous since 1997. Peter Bond is a retired physicist who worked at Brookhaven National Laboratory for 43 years in a wide variety of roles, including interim laboratory director during much of the period covered by this book.
- GenresSciencePoliticsHistoryNonfictionHistorical
344 pages, Hardcover Published October 25, 2022
About the author
Robert P. Crease
25books28followers
Professor Robert P. Crease is Chairman of the Department of Philosophy at Stony Brook University, New York.
Ratings & Reviews
What do you think?
Rate this book
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
3.96
25ratings7reviews
5 stars
9 (36%)
4 stars
7 (28%)
3 stars
8 (32%)
2 stars
1 (4%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
Victoria
443 reviews
Thanks MIT Press for sharing this ARC. I enjoyed the story, but I think this book has a limited audience. I am a member of that audience having worked at a facility similar to Brookhaven during the same time frame. I think people like me will have a greater understanding and empathy for the main players in the story. And I had great empathy for the Brookhaven employees. One interesting aspect of this was the parallel to the current climate of science denial, I hadn’t expected those similarities but it’s a totally apt comparison. Its important for everyone to understand how scientific facts can be totally discounted in the face of fear-mongering, politics, and media frenzies. I think the book needs a better title as well to grab a larger audience.
Peter
27 reviews
An excellent book that is deeply frustrating to read
Steve
655 reviews29 followers
I loved this book. The storytelling is excellent and the book reads like a novel. Character development of the protagonists and antagonists is excellent. This isn’t really a science book; it's that science provides the setting for the story. There is some science of course, but it is very well explained, with no background needed. The story itself is excellent and has many lessons for today with respect to anti-science movements. The authors were intimately involved in the story, but managed, I think, to tell as unbiased a story as possible, but the authors' pain rightly did show through. Overall this is a great read and I recommend it for anyone interested in the history of science. Thank you to Netgalley and MIT Press for the advance reader copy.
Robert Federline
341 reviews6 followers
This is a great book and highly interesting. It is not for everyone, however. Much of the material is technical in nature and speaks much more about politics than it does about the science it covers. That politics is a dirty business is amply demonstrated in this book. While this book is intensely interesting to me, I suspect most will find it too dry for their tastes. This book bespeaks corruption and social media overruling science. The corruption does not involve international espionage, or even bribery. Instead it is the corruption of the political opportunist who puts personal gain ahead of truth and honesty. It is also somewhat ironic that many of the opponents of the Brookhaven National Laboratory are among those who claim we are to trust science, but couldn't be bothered by the inconvenience of following science when making their unfounded accusations. It is unfortunate that the scientists involved are awkward with social media and the press when trying to explain the good scientific work and efforts they were making on behalf of the good of society. The Brookhaven National Laboratory was closed because there were individuals, both political and Hollywood celebrities, who refused to let the truth get in the way of a "good" story. There was more attention paid to the notoriety that could be generated than to any attempt at discovering the truth. This quote pretty well sums up the thrust of events reported in this book: "Some Long Islanders detected in the event a downward and dangerous movement in the social standing of science. If influencers on popular media programs could publicly denounce reputable institutions like the EPA and ATSDR [Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a public health agency focused on the effects of hazardous substances in the environment], they and their followers could doubt anything, believe anything, and threaten a democracy that depended on the guidance provided by facts and expert advice." p.207. This quote is the reason this book should be read by anyone who believes in truth and who wishes our democracy to be ruled by truth than by sound bites.
Hannah
326 reviews15 followers
My main takeaways are that fearmongering about nuclear research is incredibly harmful and Alec Baldwin sucks. I will say relating the situation to current vaccine misinformation seemed forced in, but I understand why it was added in.
- giveaways
Alex W
3 reviews
Really interesting and timely. Did not realize a lot of the history of the lab (and I grew up nearby). Thank you Net Galley for the opportunity to review.
Douglas Cody
5 reviews
Read
April 30, 2023Factual but so boring to read.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews